Set the room
Name the demo as a guided walk, not a product pitch.
What are you hoping AI makes possible, and what do you refuse to flatten?
Review path · collaborator mode
One clean path through the strongest work: the poster thesis, a talk jump, three flagship exercises, one story dossier, and the manifesto artifact. Built for review conversations, not a broad public launch.
Seven-stop reviewer route
The route is intentionally narrow. It proves the world before asking reviewers to inspect every room in it.
opening
The site has a strong first impression, not a landing-page preamble.
Ask: Does the opening make you want to keep walking?
Open stoptalk
The talk is navigable, shareable, and anchored to the curriculum.
Ask: Which slide should become the canonical demo jump?
Open stopexercise
The core thesis becomes a saved, exportable artifact.
Ask: Is the output worth sharing with a collaborator?
Open stopexercise
Taste is trained as repeated selection, not prompt decoration.
Ask: Do the rounds feel like creative pressure or a quiz?
Open stopexercise
Specificity loss is visible and repairable.
Ask: Does this make the mirror thesis tactile enough?
Open stopstory
The argument is grounded in a human case, not an abstract AI stance.
Ask: What footage would make this story undeniable?
Open stopartifact
The portal ends with an object people can carry out of the room.
Ask: Should the next artifact be PDF, print CSS, or foldable zine?
Open stopFacilitator runbook
The seeded review packets pointed at the same gap: the demo needs a little ceremony around it. Use this as the live-room spine before turning any feedback into the next build lane.
Name the demo as a guided walk, not a product pitch.
What are you hoping AI makes possible, and what do you refuse to flatten?
Use the talk jump to frame selection as the core creative job.
What did you keep, cut, or defend under pressure?
Pick one exercise output and make the participant explain the choice behind it.
Which line would you stand behind if the room pushed back?
Separate future media, translation, and community lanes from what is ready today.
What needs permission, provenance, or a facilitator before it goes public?
Reviewer cockpit
Keep the conversation local, tagged, and exportable. These notes are formatted for GitHub #34 so review signal can move from a call into the next build lane.
0/7
tagged
0
alive
0
craft
0
clarity
01
/ · opening
02
/talk#slide-13 · talk
03
/exercises/both-and · exercise
04
/exercises/selector-pressure-test · exercise
05
/exercises/mirror-booth · exercise
06
/stories/luke-minaker · story
07
/manifesto · artifact
Flagship curriculum proof
Slide 03
Name the tension without flattening either side.
Output: Both/And statement PNG
Demo thisSlide 12
See how generic input flattens voice and restore specificity.
Output: Voice-preservation note
Demo thisSlide 13
Make repeated choices and notice taste under pressure.
Output: Taste-pressure profile
Demo thisCurriculum coverage map
| Slide | Topic | Artifact | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06b | Stop saying bias | Specific harm statement | Consent/provenance drill with source evidence. |
| 08 | The conductor still matters | Style guide, worldview, glossary | Multi-agent conductor sequencer with audio/state maturity. |
| 09 | AI as access to participation | Irreducible human list | Scenario cards for disabled, emerging, and under-resourced creators. |
| 10 | Not a product, an ecosystem | Local ecosystem graph | Live-room collaboration and shared export. |
| 17 | Stay in the room | 55/12 Gauge concept only | Public source for adoption stats before build. |
Parked for public launch
parked
Needs explicit source/provenance updates for future swaps; seven abstract source-pack clips are already curated.
parked
Needs scope and URL strategy before implementation.
parked
Needs destination choice: Resend, Airtable, Notion, database, or file.
parked
Needs names, permissions, and community workflow.
blocked
Needs a public source for the 55% / 12% adoption stats.